According to the talian newspaper Corriere della Sera, for Italian prosecutors, Juventus manager Fabio Paratici allegedly made false statements. Now Luis Suarez's issue investigations seem to involve Juventus. According to Corriere della Sera, in fact, according to the prosecutors of Perugia, Luigi Chiappero, lawyer of the Juventus club, and Fabio Paratici would have made false statements and made the reconstruction of the facts carried out by the office more difficult.
Among the hypotheses being examined by the investigators there would also be the possibility that an infiltrator may have informed Juventus of the investigation and the wiretapping that were bringing to light the farce exam organized by the University for Foreigners of Perugia.
Prosectors said: "There are well-founded doubts that the Juventus representatives could have been aware, between 8 and 14 September, of this proceeding and the technical activities in progress." According to the indictment, this is the reason why the lawyer Chiappero was no longer interested in the Suarez case at the Viminale and would no longer answer the phone to deputy prefect Antonella Dinacci, who tried to call him several times.
Juve, just three days after Suarez passed the exam, decided to change their goal and signed Alvaro Morata. We already told you how Fabio Paratici was investigated. The same Juventus FC, through an official note, confirmed the investigation by the Perugia prosecutor's office on the Italian exam taken by Suarez.
Juventus said: "Sure about strongly the correctness of Paratici's work and is confident that the ongoing investigations will help to clarify the its position in a reasonable time." According to the prosecution, it emerged that the contents of the test had been previously communicated to the player himself, reaching to predetermine the outcome and the score of the examination, to correspond to the requests that had been made by Juventus, with the aim of achieving a positive return of image, both personal and for the University.
Luis Suarez's issue: "Juventus would have hindered the investigation"
From investigations it seems emerges that the Juventus manager contacted the Minister of Transport Paola de Micheli to speed up the ministerial practice of recognition of Italian citizenship against the player for a period in the company's crosshairs.
According to the investigators, the government representative gave the manager the contact of the head of the interior office of the Interior Ministry, Bruno Frattasi, as she herself admitted. What Juventus and the University of Perugia risk.
The prosecutor of Perugia, directed by Raffaele Cantone, said: "After the searches and seizures of 22 September 2020, the investigations, continued without interruption and in strict compliance with the principle of confidentiality, have significantly corroborated the evidential framework that had already been outlined in relation to the organization, by the suspects, during a session set up ad personam, of a farce exam, which allowed the release of the B1 type certificate of knowledge of the Italian language to the well-known Uruguayan footballer Luis Alberto Suarez, a prerequisite for obtaining citizenship.
In particular, it emerged that the contents of the test had been previously communicated to the player himself, arriving at predetermining the outcome and the exam score, to correspond to the requests that had been made by Juventus, with the aim of obtaining a positive return of image, both personal and for the University."
They also said: "The investigative investigations also made it possible to understand how, in the first days of September 2020, the management of the Turin club had taken action, even at the highest institutional levels, to accelerate the recognition of Italian citizenship against Suarez, thus making the hypothesis of new hypotheses of crime against persons other than those belonging to the university, still under investigation.
Sharing the accusatory hypotheses, the Judge for the preliminary investigations ordered the measures precautionary measures having detected the concrete and current risk that the suspects, if not subjected to appropriate caution, re-propose criminal conduct similar to those for which one proceeds, having shown that they consider the institution to which they belong and which represent as a res private manageable to your liking."