Has Doc Rivers Turned the Bucks' Fortunes Around Compared to Adrian Griffin?

Milwaukee Bucks Navigate Rocky Mid-Season Transition

by Nouman Rasool
Has Doc Rivers Turned the Bucks' Fortunes Around Compared to Adrian Griffin?
© Patrick McDermott/Getty Images

In a surprising twist earlier this year, the Milwaukee Bucks parted ways with head coach Adrian Griffin, despite boasting a strong 30-13 record. The Bucks' decision to bring in Doc Rivers, a storied figure in basketball coaching circles, has been a focal point of NBA discussions.

Rivers, known for his pivotal role in guiding the Boston Celtics to an NBA Championship in 2008, came into the Bucks' setup with a legacy of transforming teams into formidable contenders. His tenure with the Celtics was marked by the creation of the legendary "Big Three," comprising Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, and Ray Allen, catapulting the team to an impressive 66-16 record and a championship win over the Los Angeles Lakers.

The Bucks' decision to replace Griffin with Rivers was influenced by several factors, including a noticeable dip in defensive prowess and concerns over the team's offensive strategy, particularly the integration of Damian Lillard with Giannis Antetokounmpo.

The expectation was that Rivers, with his rich coaching background, would address these issues and steer the team back to its championship-contending trajectory. However, Rivers' impact on the team has been mixed. Since taking the helm, Rivers has managed a 15-16 record, a step back in terms of win percentage compared to Griffin's tenure.

While there have been improvements in the team's defense, the offense appears to have lost some of its dynamism, resulting in an overall mediocre performance.

Bucks' Coaching Conundrum

The transition from Griffin to Rivers also underscores the Bucks' strategic pivot and the challenges inherent in mid-season coaching changes.

With Rivers at the wheel, the Bucks have shown a defensive uptick but at the cost of their offensive potency. This adjustment period has been further complicated by key player injuries and lineup changes, notably Khris Middleton's limited appearances due to injury during Rivers' tenure.

Critics and fans alike have debated the wisdom of the Bucks' coaching change, with some viewing Griffin's dismissal as premature. Griffin, after all, led the team to a record that would project to a 57-win season, an impressive feat by any standard.

Under Griffin, the Bucks not only posted a formidable win rate but also demonstrated a synergy that seemed promising for playoff success. As the Bucks navigate this transition, the juxtaposition of Griffin's and Rivers' coaching philosophies and outcomes offers a compelling narrative.

Both coaches have approached the team's challenges with distinct strategies, yet the on-court results have been surprisingly similar in terms of point differential per 100 possessions. This similarity suggests that while coaching styles and game plans may vary, the ultimate measure of success in the NBA often hinges on player availability, team chemistry, and the ability to execute under pressure.

Milwaukee Bucks